December 16, 2016
I recently wrote you in regard to the Heartbeat Bill, which was part of HB 493. I’m so very glad that you line-item vetoed it. I understand that you had different reasons than me for disapproving of it. Your rationale for your veto was based on the likelihood that the law would be struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, as was the case in laws passed in North Dakota and Arkansas.
But, as you wrote in your statement, you have “a deep respect for the pro-life community and their ongoing efforts in the defense of unborn life.”
You presumably demonstrated this respect for unborn life by taking a different action.
You signed into law a 20-week abortion ban. With no exceptions for rape or incest. And very limited provisions for abortions that endanger the life of the mother.
On its face, this law can seem more reasonable than the Heartbeat Bill. After all, 20 weeks? That’s five months of pregnancy. What kind of woman waits that long to make the decision to have an abortion? And what about all those pictures of aborted 20-week-old babies? Awful. Just awful.
Certainly, such a ban stops the most atrocious acts of violence that are being committed against thousands of innocent, unborn children?
But this rationale is a myth.
It’s not grounded in reality.
I read the Ohio Department of Health’s 2014 report on induced abortions. If you pay attention, a quite different picture of a typical 20-week abortion emerges from this report. Here are some quick facts:
- Only 510 of the 21,186 abortions that were performed in 2014 happened after 19 weeks of pregnancy. That is 2% of total abortions.
- Of the 510 abortions after 19 weeks, only 1 was performed on a viable fetus.
- 509 abortions after 19 weeks were performed on non-viable fetuses.
Those are facts, collected and compiled from your own state agency.
In other words, only 1 abortion in the state of Ohio was performed on a fetus that could have survived outside of its mother’s womb.
Unfortunately, the exact reasons that women obtain abortions after 20 weeks has not been widely studied, possibly because they make up only 2% of total abortions in the United States. (Even though they garner the most public outcry.)
But let me point out one clear reason why some women have abortions at 20 weeks.
It is at this point that some women first find out that their child will not survive outside of the womb. They have anencephaly (no brain) or bilateral renal agenesis (no kidneys) or severe omphalocele (all organs are growing outside of the body).
This is the reality of the 20-week abortion ban: It means that next year women who would have chosen to end their pregnancies because their child was not going to survive, now have no choice about how to deal with their grief.
They must carry their dying babies as long as their bodies will allow and as long as their babies’ hearts continue to beat.
Yes, I know. Some women have told you remarkably moving stories about how they persevered through their grief and gave birth to their babies and held them for a few hours before they passed away in their arms. Their stories are regarded by many as both honorable and heroic. Even in the certainty of tragedy, these women pressed on and allowed their children the great blessing of being born into this world. Even though they died shortly afterward.
These experiences are beautiful stories. And for some women, these experiences are the major catalyst for their own healing.
But–and this is truly, truly important–not every woman grieves in the same way.
Grief is personal. It is highly dependent on our individual personalities and coping mechanisms.
What I am saying is this: We should not create one acceptable path for how women are allowed to process the grief that follows the devastating knowledge that their child will not survive after birth.
It is no less motherly to want to end your child’s suffering inside the womb so he will never know a life of pain. It is no more motherly to carry your child to term and hold him in your arms as he passes.
They are just different ways of grieving.
But this 20-week abortion ban takes away one of those options.
Now, women who are carrying babies with terminal diagnoses will have no choice about how to deal with their grief.
Can you imagine what it feels like to carry impending death with you? Everywhere you go? Every moment of your life?
Can you imagine just trying to live a normal life, without having to remember every moment of it that your child is dying? Even as your body continues to grow and grow?
Can you imagine trying to go about your day without bursting into tears when someone tells you “congratulations?”
Can you imagine all the strangers’ comments, every day, all day? How far along are you? What are you having? Is this your first? Are you excited? You look great! Do you have the baby’s room ready?
Can you imagine trying to get out of conversations about the pregnancy? Because you don’t really want to explain the whole situation to your mechanic. Or the cashier. Or the visitor at your church.
And every time, feeling that you are just betraying your child once again.
Can you imagine the tension of wanting your child’s life to end so you can finally move on?
Can you imagine the unspeakable guilt? Can you imagine these feelings that you don’t dare utter aloud because people will think that you don’t love your child?
Can you imagine your absolute rage that you have become a prisoner to your own body, stamped and approved by the country that you love, but whose laws you so passionately disagree with?
Can you imagine… reaching a point when you look for an alternative?
Maybe someone can help you out. Off the record. Maybe you could get this process going with some medications that you order on-line. Or maybe you could go to another state? Not Indiana. But maybe Pennsylvania?
That is how women find themselves looking at ways to have abortions at home. Without medical help.
That is how women die.
Governor Kasich, I don’t believe it is your intention to put women into such a situation. You seem to be a reasonable man, but perhaps a man who isn’t familiar with the perspective of pregnant women.
I am currently 34 weeks pregnant with my second child. At this stage, this pregnancy is consuming my life. I’m carrying around 35 extra pounds. I can’t breathe normally. I can’t eat a full meal. I can’t sleep comfortably. I pee about 18 times a day and constantly through the night. In every conversation that I have with strangers, they comment on my pregnancy. I cannot avoid it without being rude.
So I just take it.
As will these women who won’t be able to have abortions after 20 weeks.
To carry a pregnancy doesn’t just mean to keep living and breathing. It means that you slowly conform to the child. You let go and let go and let go. The child grows and grows and the only way to get through it is to surrender.
That is hard enough to do when you know your child is healthy and will very likely survive.
Can you imagine how hard that is to do for women who know their child is going to die?
Governor Kasich, I ask that you carefully consider the reality that this law will now have on women. We’re not talking about saving thousands of perfectly healthy babies from selfish, horrible mothers that want to kill them. We are talking about a group of women who are making the most incredibly difficult decision of their lives while immersed in grief.
Dayton, Ohio 45459